The "Missing Piece" in Evolution

I recently found this article on the internet because i wanted to have an informed stance on evolution, not just a biased, unsupported opinion. I've learned about the evidence supporting evolution of man, but no one talks about evidence opposing it, so here is some.

If you want to read more, here is the website address: http://www.allaboutscience.org/evolution-of-man.htm

Evolution Of Man -
Scientific EvidenceThe theory of evolution of man is supported by a set of independent observations within the fields of anthropology, paleontology, and molecular biology. Collectively, they depict life branching out from a common ancestor through gradual genetic changes over millions of years, commonly known as the "tree of life." Although accepted in mainstream science as altogether factual and experimentally proven, a closer examination of the evidences reveal some inaccuracies and reasonable alternative explanations. This causes a growing number of scientists to dissent from the Darwinian theory of evolution for its inability to satisfactorily explain the origin of man.

One of the major evidences for the evolution of man is homology, that is, the similarity of either anatomical or genetic features between species. For instance, the resemblance in the skeleton structure of apes and humans has been correlated to the homologous genetic sequences within each species as strong evidence for common ancestry. This argument contains the major assumption that similarity equals relatedness. In other words, the more alike two species appear, the more closely they are related to one another. This is known to be a poor assumption. Two species can have homologous anatomy even though they are not related in any way. This is called "convergence" in evolutionary terms. It is now known that homologous features can be generated from entirely different gene segments within different unrelated species. The reality of convergence implies that anatomical features arise because of the need for specific functionality, which is a serious blow to the concept of homology and ancestry.

Additionally, the evolution of man from ape-like ancestors is often argued on the grounds of comparative anatomy within the fossil record. Yet, the fossil record indicates more stability in the forms of species than slow or even drastic changes, which would indicate intermediate stages between modern species. The "missing links" are missing. And unfortunately, the field of paleoanthropology has been riddled with fraudulent claims of finding the missing link between humans and primates, to the extent that fragments of human skeletons have been combined with other species such as pigs and apes and passed off as legitimate. Although genetic variability is seen across all peoples, the process of natural selection leading to speciation is disputed. Research challenging the accepted paradigm continues to surface raising significant questions about the certainty of evolution as the origin of man.

ALSO: (This was not on the web page, but can be found in many other places)
Darwin stated in his book, "numerous successive modifications that cannot be explained by scientific evidence would break down my theory". Basically, this modification type has been found in many places, namely, the flagellum motor. The flagellum motor is like a propeller for the flagellum and consists of 25 different proteins. According to natural selection, these 25 different proteins should have all appeared on the flagellum gradually through means of natural selection. PROBLEM. There is absolutely no evidence of an in-between connector species of flagellum to prove natural selection to be true. The "numerous successive modifications" has been found.

Google search carbon-14 dating flaws... evidence of a "great flood" has also been found.

In regard to any scientific theory, people have to look at the evidence supporting it (or lack of it)AS WELL AS evidence opposing it before they can make an opinion in support of it.